On March 22, a lone gunman opened fire inside a King Soopers supermarket in Boulder, Colorado, killing 10 people. Bystander Dean Schiller filmed a three-hour video of the chaos from outside the store, capturing the sounds of the gunshots being fired inside the store, video of dead bodies outside the supermarket, and, ultimately, the shooter being led out of the building by police. Schiller, a self-described journalist, has been criticized for filming the graphic material, with many viewers taking to social media to condemn his behavior during the shooting, which allegedly includes arguing with police officers on the scene and speculating about both the identity of the shooter and the motive behind the crime; YouTube has been similarly criticized for keeping the video up. And for the latest news delivered straight to your inbox, sign up for our daily newsletter. Schiller’s video, which had been viewed 735,000 times as of Wednesday, March 24, remains on YouTube, despite backlash from countless individuals on social media who’ve called for it to be removed. “@YouTube needs to delete his videos and suspend his account,” wrote one Twitter user. Another wrote, “Here’s a radical idea. When you see an active shooter nearby, don’t start livestreaming footage of innocent people who seem to have been shot and then shout: ‘We need 911 here right now. Stop the bloody stream and use your mobile phone to call emergency services for help.” Due to its graphic nature, the video now has two warnings from YouTube that precede it, which deem the content “inappropriate or offensive to some audiences” and “inappropriate for some users,” respectively. Viewers must click a box confirming they “understand and wish to proceed” on each of the two disclaimers before the content becomes available to them. And for more businesses facing customer backlash, This Is the Most Unpopular Cell Phone Carrier, According to Data. However, despite the backlash, YouTube claims the video is not in violation of the site’s policies due to its journalistic merit. “We do allow certain violent or graphic content with sufficient news or documentary context, and so we’ve applied an age restriction to this particular content. We will continue to monitor this rapidly changing situation,” said YouTube spokesperson Elena Hernandez in a statement, via The New York Times. Best Life has reached out to YouTube for further commentary. In November 2020, YouTube ruffled feathers after it refused to take down a video that claimed Donald Trump had won the 2020 presidential election prior to it being called, despite the video seemingly violating the video service’s terms and conditions.ae0fcc31ae342fd3a1346ebb1f342fcb While YouTube did not remove the video, it took ads off the clip, thus undermining its profitability. “We do not allow ads to run on content that undermines confidence in elections with demonstrably false information,” YouTube spokeswoman Christa Muldoon told CNBC at the time. “The election has not been called. Therefore, this is in scope of our demonstrably false policy and will be demonetized on YouTube.” And for more controversies in the news, This Is Why Everyone’s Mad at Burger King Right Now.
